From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zuga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2003
306 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-07089

Argued June 6, 2003.

June 23, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered August 6, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Briccetti, Calhoun Lawrence, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Kerry A. Lawrence and Audrey E. Stone of counsel), for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Robin A. Forshaw and Laurie M. Israel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, BARRY A. COZIER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly allowed the defendant to represent himself at trial. The defendant's clear and unequivocal waiver of the right to counsel was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, after the Supreme Court's repeated warnings as to the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation (see People v. Arroyo, 98 N.Y.2d 101, 103-104; People v. McIntyre, 36 N.Y.2d 10, 17; People v. Benitez, 281 A.D.2d 427; People v. Trivino, 266 A.D.2d 323).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence.

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SCHMIDT, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Zuga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2003
306 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Zuga

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. WILLIAM ZUGA, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 840

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Instead, at least in part because of the court's failure to make the necessary inquiry, it was unclear at…

People v. Savage

The contents of the radio transmission, coupled with the arresting officer's personal observations, were…