From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1962
18 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

December 3, 1962


In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated January 25, 1962, which denied, without a hearing, his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered December 16, 1957, after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and kidnapping, and imposing sentence. Order affirmed. The application was made on the ground that, under the recent holding in Mapp v. Ohio ( 367 U.S. 643), evidence had been erroneously received at defendant's trial in 1957. Defendant did not appeal from the judgment of conviction. Hence, he cannot now be heard to raise the question of admissibility of evidence ( People v. Caminito, 3 N.Y.2d 596, 601); nor can coram nobis be deemed an available substitute remedy ( People v. De Groat, 13 A.D.2d 557; People v. Morrison, 14 A.D.2d 887). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Zito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1962
18 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

People v. Zito

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AGATINO ZITO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1962

Citations

18 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
234 N.Y.S.2d 884

Citing Cases

People v. Upson

Defendant, prior to the judgment of conviction, did not move to suppress the illegal evidence, but instead…

People v. Macchi

It is settled law that the remedy of coram nobis should not be substituted for that of an appeal. ( People v.…