From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zapata-Lopez, Franco-Casa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 1997
238 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 28, 1997


Appeal by the People from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), both dated March 14, 1996, which granted those branches of the defendants' respective omnibus motions which were to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence presented to the Grand Jury was legally insufficient.

Ordered that the orders are reversed, on the law, those branches of the defendants' respective omnibus motions which were to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence presented to the Grand Jury was legally insufficient are denied, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

The Police Laboratory Analysis Report containing the results of the ballistics examination of the gun which the defendants allegedly possessed constituted legally sufficient evidence establishing the operability of that weapon ( see, People v Rodriguez, 235 A.D.2d 504; CPL 190.30). Consequently, the Supreme Court erred in dismissing the indictment. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Zapata-Lopez, Franco-Casa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 1997
238 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Zapata-Lopez, Franco-Casa

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. LUIS ZAPATA-LOPEZ and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 955

Citing Cases

People v. Phillips

A person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when "[h]e or she possesses any…