In Zangari, the reasonable inference of asportation arose not simply from the fact that restitution was ordered to be paid to an individual living at the burglarized premises, but also from the fact that the restitution amount was to be reduced if additional property was recovered in satisfactory condition.
Summary of this case from People v. ParkerA091689
Filed June 21, 2001 REVIEW GRANTED
In Zangari, the reasonable inference of asportation arose not simply from the fact that restitution was ordered to be paid to an individual living at the burglarized premises, but also from the fact that the restitution amount was to be reduced if additional property was recovered in satisfactory condition.
Summary of this case from People v. ParkerFull title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NICHOLAS ROBERT ZANGARI…
Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Four
Date published: Jun 21, 2001
In particular, defendant maintains that the mental state required for robbery in Oregon is something less…
People v. ParkerTo qualify as a strike, a conviction in another jurisdiction must include all of the elements of the…