From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zamora

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two.
Nov 24, 2003
E033685 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 24, 2003)

Opinion

E033685.

11-24-2003

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY ZAMORA, Defendant and Appellant.

Kent Douglas Baker, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


After Michael Anthony Zamora (defendant) waived jury trial of the Board of Prison Terms (BPT) finding, at his annual review, that he continued to be a mentally disordered offender (Pen. Code, § 2966, subd. (c)), the trial court agreed with the BPT and remanded Zamora to Patton State Hospital.

Defendant appealed and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493], setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.

We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: McKINSTER J. and RICHLI J.


Summaries of

People v. Zamora

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two.
Nov 24, 2003
E033685 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 24, 2003)
Case details for

People v. Zamora

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY ZAMORA, Defendant…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two.

Date published: Nov 24, 2003

Citations

E033685 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 24, 2003)