From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zalevsky

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 22, 2021
197 A.D.3d 1258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2007–05887 Ind. No. 4320/04

09-22-2021

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Gregory ZALEVSKY, appellant.

Gregory Zalevsky, Attica, NY, appellant pro se. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel), for respondent. Patricia Panzer, New York, NY, former appellate counsel.


Gregory Zalevsky, Attica, NY, appellant pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel), for respondent.

Patricia Panzer, New York, NY, former appellate counsel.

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., WILLIAM F. MASTRO, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 22, 2011 ( People v. Zalevsky, 82 A.D.3d 1136, 918 N.Y.S.2d 790 ), determining an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 18, 2007.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

LASALLE, P.J., MASTRO, HINDS–RADIX and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Zalevsky

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 22, 2021
197 A.D.3d 1258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Zalevsky

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Gregory ZALEVSKY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

197 A.D.3d 1258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
151 N.Y.S.3d 640

Citing Cases

People v. Pryor

If the defendant makes that twofold showing, the court must exercise its discretion by weighing the…