From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 30, 1997

Appeal from Erie County Court, Rogowski, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


By pleading guilty to a superior court information charging him with criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and bail jumping in the second degree, defendant waived his contention that the proceeding was untimely commenced in violation of CPL 580.20 ( see, People v. Gooden, 151 A.D.2d 773, 774; People v. Cusick, 111 A.D.2d 251; People v. Nelson [appeal No. 1], 79 A.D.2d 1093).

Defendant further contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because defense counsel took a position adverse to defendant's CPL 580.20 motion. We disagree. Defendant had already entered his guilty plea, thereby waiving his contention with respect to CPL 580.20, and defendant does not contend that defense counsel's subsequent conduct concerning the CPL 580.20 motion infected the plea bargaining process or that he entered his guilty plea because of that conduct ( see, People v Wood, 207 A.D.2d 1001; cf., People v. Kellar, 213 A.D.2d 1063).


Summaries of

People v. Zak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Zak

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM ZAK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 654

Citing Cases

People v. Pizetsky

The nonjurisdictional nature of the statute being settled, the next issue is the impact of a plea of guilty…

People v. Pizetsky

As noted in a number of cases, allegations of defects as claimed have been held as not surviving a guilty…