From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zaire

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2014
123 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-12-30

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David ZAIRE, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sheila L. Bautista of counsel), for respondent.



Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sheila L. Bautista of counsel), for respondent.
ACOSTA, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, FEINMAN, CLARK, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Nunez, J.), entered on or about December 18, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed points under the risk factor for the victim's physical helplessness during the rape, because she was handcuffed and her mouth was taped shut, rendering her unable to communicate consent ( seePenal Law § 130.00[7]; People v. Teicher, 52 N.Y.2d 638, 649, 439 N.Y.S.2d 846, 422 N.E.2d 506 [1980] ). The court also properly assessed points for unsatisfactory conduct while confined, including sexual misconduct, since reliable documents showed defendant engaged in an act of lewdness directed at a female officer, as well as committing many other infractions ( see People v. Birch, 99 A.D.3d 422, 952 N.Y.S.2d 10 [1st Dept.2012], lv. denied20 N.Y.3d 854, 958 N.Y.S.2d 698, 982 N.E.2d 618 [2012] ). To the extent defendant is challenging any other point assessments, we find those challenges unavailing.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure ( see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). The mitigating factors cited by defendant, including his age (mid 50s) and lack of a prior criminal record, do not warrant a downward departure in light of the seriousness of the underlying offense, which was a heinous crime of predatory violence.


Summaries of

People v. Zaire

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2014
123 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Zaire

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David ZAIRE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 30, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
123 A.D.3d 641
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 9060

Citing Cases

People v. Tira Law

While it is plain that defendant attempted to gag the victim, the record does not contain clear and…

People v. Malena

The risk assessment instrument did not adequately account for these aggravating factors, which justified the…