From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Yupa-Paucar

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Dec 17, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 160 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

570777/13

12-17-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alejandro YUPA-PAUCAR, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Melissa A. Crane, J. at plea; Steven M. Statsinger, J. at sentencing), rendered July 16, 2013, affirmed.

Defendant had the practical ability to withdraw his plea before sentencing, and his challenges to the validity of his plea do not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Conceicao , 26 NY3d 375, 381—382 [2015] ; People v Santos , 140 AD3d 499 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1031 [2016] ). We decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, despite the absence of a full enumeration of all the rights waived (see People v Sougou , 26 NY3d 1052, 1054 [2015] ; People v Simmons , 138 AD3d 520 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1139 [2016] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

People v. Yupa-Paucar

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Dec 17, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 160 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

People v. Yupa-Paucar

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alejandro Yupa-Paucar…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Dec 17, 2019

Citations

65 Misc. 3d 160 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 52014
119 N.Y.S.3d 804