From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 1986
118 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

March 17, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (De Lury, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The defendant failed to object to the allegedly improper comments made by the prosecutor in his opening statement and summation or to the charge, and therefore has failed to preserve his contentions for appellate review (see, People v. Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818; People v. Baldo, 107 A.D.2d 751). In any event, we find his arguments to be without merit.

The prosecutor's comments were supported by the evidence and were made in fair response to defense counsel's closing arguments. We also find the trial court's instructions to the jury, when viewed as a whole, adequately explained the concept of reasonable doubt (see, People v. Ortiz, 92 A.D.2d 595; People v Patterson, 76 A.D.2d 891; People v. Turrell, 66 A.D.2d 862, affd 50 N.Y.2d 400, cert denied 449 U.S. 1087). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 1986
118 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Young

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUFUS YOUNG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1986

Citations

118 A.D.2d 745 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Ricks

The defendant's claim that he was deprived of a fair trial due to comments made by the prosecutor in…

People v. Hudson

However, inasmuch as defense counsel failed to make specific objections to the challenged remarks, the…