From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1993
194 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 1, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Howard E. Bell, J.).


Defendant failed to show that defense counsel did not effectively represent him prior to his plea (People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137). To the contrary, counsel used sound judgment in advising the defendant to plead guilty in the face of overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt in order to receive a reduced sentence.

Defendant's assertion that his attorney coerced him into pleading guilty is refuted by the plea colloquy which demonstrates that defendant knowingly and intelligently acknowledged that he committed the crime charged. Accordingly, defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea was properly denied (see, People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1993
194 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Young

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALTER YOUNG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 222

Citing Cases

People v. Gelzer

The defendant's application was based upon conclusory and unsupported allegations of coercion and inadequate…