Opinion
October 30, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that he had knowledge of the weight of the controlled substance is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Lawrence, 85 N.Y.2d 1002; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. The defendant's contention that the evidence as to the chain of custody of the vials was insufficient to support a finding that the evidence admitted was the same as that seized from the defendant is also unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Jackson, 199 A.D.2d 535). The evidence was admitted without objection and the defendant's motion for a trial order of dismissal did not specify this ground.
The remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J.P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.