From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Young

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 28, 2016
138 A.D.3d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

04-28-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lorde YOUNG, Defendant–Appellant.

Scott A. Rosenberg, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.


Scott A. Rosenberg, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered December 6, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The sentencing court properly found that it had no discretion to defer defendant's mandatory surcharge (see People v. Jones, 26 N.Y.3d 730, 27 N.Y.S.3d 431, 47 N.E.3d 710 [2016] ).

ACOSTA, J.P., RENWICK, MANZANET–DANIELS, KAPNICK, GESMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Young

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 28, 2016
138 A.D.3d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Young

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lorde YOUNG…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 28, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3247
28 N.Y.S.3d 877

Citing Cases

People v. Tookes

In each case the First Department held that: “The sentencing court properly found that it had no discretion…