Opinion
February 14, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).
We have reviewed the issues raised in the defendant's supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.