From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wyant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 13, 2000
274 A.D.2d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

July 13, 2000.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (La Buda, J.), rendered April 15, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.

Pasquale La Pietra, Latham, for appellant.

Stephen F. Lungen, District Attorney (Bonnie M. Mitzner of counsel), Monticello, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello, Graffeo and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of sexual abuse in the first degree as a result of his molestation of a 21-month-old infant. Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a definite term of six years in prison. Defendant now argues that his negotiated sentence was harsh and excessive in light of his alcoholism and claim that he is suffering from untreated attention deficit disorder. We disagree. "A sentence within permissible statutory ranges will not be disturbed unless extraordinary circumstances exist warranting a modification" (People v. David, 263 A.D.2d 615, 615). Here, given defendant's prior criminal history and his heinous conduct toward a helpless child, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed (see, id.).

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello, Graffeo and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Wyant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 13, 2000
274 A.D.2d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Wyant

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN WYANT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 13, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 465

Citing Cases

People v. Mulleavey

Ordered that the amended judgments are affirmed. The defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the…