From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wu

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Feb 13, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 144 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

570214/14

02-13-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. XINQUAN WU, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Robert H. Straus, J.H.O.), rendered February 4, 2014, reversed on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and fine, if paid, remitted.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama , 395 US 238 [1969] ). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015] ).

In view of our disposition, we reach no other issue.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

People v. Wu

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Feb 13, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 144 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

People v. Wu

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Xinquan Wu…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Feb 13, 2019

Citations

62 Misc. 3d 144 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 50163
113 N.Y.S.3d 467