In People v. Wright (136 N.Y. 625, 632) it was held that under the recent decisions of this court, there was no error in proving the defendant's declarations when examined before the coroner.
Summary of this case from People v. KennedyArgued October 20, 1892
Decided November 29, 1892
Richard L. Hand for appellant.
Francis A. Smith for respondent.
PECKHAM, J., reads for reversal.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
In People v. Wright (136 N.Y. 625, 632) it was held that under the recent decisions of this court, there was no error in proving the defendant's declarations when examined before the coroner.
Summary of this case from People v. KennedyFull title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . CHARLES A. WRIGHT…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 29, 1892
But the question asked by the defendant's counsel does not fall within any of those exceptions. Even in cases…
People v. SekonaThe term "maliciously" as it is applicable to mayhem, is defined as "a wish to vex, annoy, or injure another…