From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wright

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 11, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

106358

12-11-2014

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rashawn WRIGHT, Appellant.

Larry Rosen, Albany, for appellant. P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Brittany L. Grome of counsel), for respondent.


Larry Rosen, Albany, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Brittany L. Grome of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PETERS, P.J., GARRY, EGAN JR. and DEVINE, JJ.

Opinion

DEVINE, J.Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Ceresia, J.), rendered November 15, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

To resolve all potential charges stemming from his involvement in a string of home burglaries, defendant pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal from the conviction and sentence. County Court further advised defendant that it was making no commitment on the issue of whether to adjudicate him a youthful offender. County Court thereafter denied defendant's request for youthful offender status and sentenced him, within the range contemplated by the plea agreement, to a prison term of six years to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, and we now affirm.

Defendant does not challenge the validity of his guilty plea or appeal waiver, and the record reveals that both were voluntary, knowing and intelligent. To the extent that defendant now challenges the agreed-upon sentence as harsh and excessive, his argument is precluded by his valid appeal waiver (see People v. Fate, 117 A.D.3d 1327, 1329, 986 N.Y.S.2d 672 [2014] ). His valid appeal waiver similarly precludes his contention that County Court “improperly denied him youthful offender treatment and his request that we exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to grant him youthful offender status” ( People v. Torres, 110 A.D.3d 1119, 1119, 972 N.Y.S.2d 738 [2013] ), lv. denied 22 N.Y.3d 1044, 981 N.Y.S.2d 377, 4 N.E.3d 389 [2013] [internal citations omitted]; accord People v. Fate, 117 A.D.3d at 1329, 986 N.Y.S.2d 672 ).ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

PETERS, P.J., GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wright

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 11, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RASHAWN WRIGHT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 11, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 1241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
996 N.Y.S.2d 556
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8683

Citing Cases

People v. Simon

Furthermore, defendant acknowledged that he understood the nature of the waiver of the right to appeal,…

People v. Roberts

Defendant's sole contention is that County Court erred in declining to treat him as a youthful offender. This…