From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wright

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2011
89 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-9

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.James WRIGHT, appellant.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Maria Park of counsel; Tiffany L. Henry on the brief), for respondent.

Appeals by the defendant from three resentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), all imposed August 4, 2010, upon his convictions of grand larceny in the third degree (three counts, one as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty.

ORDERED that the resentences are affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was ineffective ( see People v. Grant, 83 A.D.3d 862, 863, 921 N.Y.S.2d 285; People v. Bradshaw, 76 A.D.3d 566, 569–570, 906 N.Y.S.2d 93, lv. granted 15 N.Y.3d 896, 912 N.Y.S.2d 585, 938 N.E.2d 1020).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, however, the resentences imposed were not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 85, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

SKELOS, J.P., HALL, LOTT and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wright

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2011
89 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.James WRIGHT, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8177
932 N.Y.S.2d 353

Citing Cases

People v. Santiago

*887ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed. Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not…

People v. Lopez

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not validly…