From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wosu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 31, 1998


Motion for review and determination, and for other relief denied. Memorandum: "[I]n the absence of an authorizing statute no direct appeal lies" from an order denying a motion to inspect Grand Jury minutes ( Matter of Miranda v. Isseks, 41 A.D.2d 176, 177; see, Matter of Hudson v. Albany County Grand Jury, 165 A.D.2d 966, 967). In addition, no direct appeal lies from an order denying a motion for disclosure of a presentence report ( see, People v. Wright, 206 A.D.2d 337, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 873).

Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Wosu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Wosu

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, v. JOY WOSU, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 1247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
683 N.Y.S.2d 458

Citing Cases

People v. Young

In that regard, the Schenectady County District Attorney's Office applied for disclosure of the PSI with the…