From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Woolson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 16, 1993

Appeal from the Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Balio, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, plea and waiver of indictment vacated and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant was arraigned on a felony complaint charging him with attempted murder in the first degree, a class A-I felony, and was held for Grand Jury action on that charge. Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging reckless endangerment in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.25) and driving while ability impaired (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192).

Defendant, in his pro se supplemental brief, correctly observes that a person charged by felony complaint with the commission of a class A felony and held for Grand Jury action on that complaint cannot waive his right to prosecution by Grand Jury indictment (see, CPL 195.10 [b]; People v Marty, 150 A.D.2d 171, 172; People v. Sledge, 90 A.D.2d 588, lv denied 58 N.Y.2d 977). Thus, the judgment is reversed, the plea and waiver of indictment are vacated and the matter is remitted for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Woolson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Woolson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES D. WOOLSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 16, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 587

Citing Cases

People v. Trueluck

He pleaded guilty to the charges contained in the information and was sentenced in accordance with the…

People v. Trueluck

We are constrained to agree. As this Court has previously explained, "CPL 195.10 provides that a defendant…