From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Woods

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 2, 2015
124 A.D.3d 1312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

01-02-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald WOODS, Defendant–Appellant.

Michael J. Stachowski, P.C., Buffalo (Michael J. Stachowski of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of Counsel), for Respondent.


Michael J. Stachowski, P.C., Buffalo (Michael J. Stachowski of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of Counsel), for Respondent.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, and VALENTINO, JJ.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted assault in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05 [2 ] ). We agree with defendant that the plea is invalid based upon the factual insufficiency of the plea allocution. We note at the outset that defendant did not preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution by moving to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 ). We conclude, however, that this case falls within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement inasmuch as defendant's response to Supreme Court's question concerning his guilt “clearly cast [ ] significant doubt upon his guilt or otherwise call[ed] into question the voluntariness of the plea,” and the court failed to conduct the requisite further inquiry to ensure that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered (id. at 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 ; see People v. Morehouse, 109 A.D.3d 1022, 1022–1023, 972 N.Y.S.2d 729 ; People v. Roy, 77 A.D.3d 1310, 1310–1311, 908 N.Y.S.2d 791 ). Defendant, moreover, never affirmatively pleaded guilty to attempted assault (see People v. Nieves, 72 A.D.2d 609, 610, 421 N.Y.S.2d 118 ), nor did he admit to any conduct underlying the crime (see People v. Bellis, 78 A.D.2d 1014, 1014, 433 N.Y.S.2d 661 ). We therefore reverse the conviction, vacate the plea and remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the indictment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings on the indictment.


Summaries of

People v. Woods

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 2, 2015
124 A.D.3d 1312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald WOODS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 2, 2015

Citations

124 A.D.3d 1312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
124 A.D.3d 1312
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 57

Citing Cases

People v. Russo

However, this case falls within the exception to the preservation requirement, as the plea allocution calls…

People v. Russo

Here, the defendant never affirmatively pleaded guilty to criminal possession of stolen property in the…