From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Woods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 2009
67 A.D.3d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-01539.

November 10, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered February 2, 2007, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Matthew Muraskin, Port Jefferson, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Florio, Miller and Hall, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was not valid ( see People v Moyett, 7 NY3d 892, 893; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257). However, contrary to the defendant's contention, his plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered ( see People v Garcia, 92 NY2d 869, 870; People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543; People v Grimes, 35 AD3d 882, 883).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Woods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 2009
67 A.D.3d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY WOODS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8252
887 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

People v. Marcinak

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We agree with the defendant's contention that the purported waiver of…