Opinion
June 29, 1999.
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.).
The record establishes that following the court's explanation to defendant of his right to be present at sidebar conferences with prospective jurors, defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived such rights ( see, People v. Vargas, 88 N.Y.2d 363). We conclude from the totality of the record that the court's warnings to defendant concerning the disadvantages of attending sidebar conferences did not affect the voluntariness of the waiver ( see, People v. McLean, 246 A.D.2d 445, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 975).
The court properly denied defendant's request for a circumstantial evidence charge since the defendant's guilt was established, in part, through direct evidence, including eyewitness testimony concerning defendant's actions ( see, People v. Roldan, 88 N.Y.2d 826; People v. Daddona, 81 N.Y.2d 990).
The court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing defendant as a persistent felony offender.
Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.