From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Woods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1987
134 A.D.2d 306 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 2, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Although there was testimony by a police fingerprint expert which could have led to an inference by the jury that the defendant had a prior criminal record, the court's immediate curative instruction corrected any prejudicial effect that evidence may have had (see, People v. Tisdale, 114 A.D.2d 869). In any event, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt as the evidence of the defendant's guilt was overwhelming (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Brown, J.P., Rubin, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Woods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1987
134 A.D.2d 306 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GARY WOODS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 306 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Tano

Consequently, we find no merit to defendant's speedy trial claim. Even if we were persuaded, and we are not,…

People v. Garcia

In any event, the testimony and summation comments that the fingerprints recovered from the scene matched…