From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wolmart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 2004
5 A.D.3d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-02389.

Decided March 22, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (LaPera, J.), rendered November 15, 2002, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and vehicular assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Gary P. Field, Huntington, N.Y., for appellant.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Robert A. Schwartz and Deborah N. Abramson of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, HOWARD MILLER, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court denied the defendant's request for an adjournment when one of the two attorneys representing him failed to appear on the scheduled trial date. The case was tried, but while the jury was deliberating, the defendant pleaded guilty. As part of the plea agreement, the defendant waived his right to appeal, including a specific waiver of any claim that he was denied the right to be represented by co-counsel. Prior to sentencing, the defendant moved to vacate his plea, contending that he was denied the right to counsel of his choice and that his plea was coerced by the court. The court denied his motion and subsequently sentenced him in accordance with the plea agreement.

The defendant waived his right to appeal his claim that he was deprived of his right to counsel of his choice, except to the extent that it may have affected the voluntariness of his plea ( see People v. Miller, 306 A.D.2d 294; People v. Morgan, 275 A.D.2d 970; People v. Segrue, 274 A.D.2d 671). The defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered and was not induced by the denial of his right to counsel or any alleged threats by the court ( see People v. Allen, 273 A.D.2d 319). Consequently, the court properly denied his motion to vacate his plea.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wolmart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 2004
5 A.D.3d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Wolmart

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. WILLIAM WOLMART, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 22, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 723

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Wolcott

Notably, unlike in People v Robbins (33 A.D.3d 1127, 1128 [3d Dept 2006]), defendant does not assert that the…

People v. Wolmart

November 19, 2004. Appeal from 2d Dept: 5 AD3d 706 (Nassau). Application in criminal case for leave to appeal…