From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wintje

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 1986
496 N.E.2d 221 (N.Y. 1986)

Opinion

Decided June 5, 1986

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, S. Barrett Hickman, J.

Paul J. McAllister for appellant.

Joseph M. Costello, District Attorney (Robert C. Lusardi of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The Trial Judge correctly charged the jury that defendant had no burden of proof with respect to his alibi and that the People must disprove the alibi beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Victor, 62 N.Y.2d 374). In light of these unequivocal instructions, the additional charge that the People need not prove that all the alibi evidence presented is false or mistaken merely clarified the weight of the People's burden. It did not shift the burden of proof onto defendant. The other purported trial errors raised by defendant either are unpreserved or harmless.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Wintje

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 1986
496 N.E.2d 221 (N.Y. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Wintje

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH WINTJE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 5, 1986

Citations

496 N.E.2d 221 (N.Y. 1986)
496 N.E.2d 221
505 N.Y.S.2d 62

Citing Cases

People v. Munson

The court's alibi charge was improper. The court did not unequivocally charge that the People had the burden…

People v. McKinley

learning of the existence of the tape and its possible destruction (see, People v. Rogelio, 79 N.Y.2d 843,…