From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Winkel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1991
178 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 30, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

The defendant contends that his sentence was excessive. The People argue that the defendant should be precluded from raising this argument because he waived his right to appeal the conviction and sentence as a condition of his guilty plea. We conclude that, upon this record, the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was effective and therefore, that this appeal should be dismissed. The record reveals that the prosecutor made it very clear upon the record that the defendant's plea was conditioned upon his waiving "any and all rights he may have to appeal his conviction or sentence" (see, People v Moissett, 76 N.Y.2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1; cf., People v Bray, 154 A.D.2d 692, 693). In the presence of the defendant, the defense counsel stated that he understood this condition and that he and the defendant accepted it. Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Winkel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1991
178 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Winkel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT WINKEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1991

Citations

178 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
578 N.Y.S.2d 230

Citing Cases

People v. Byrd

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the record establishes that…

People v. Burk

Since the sentence in this case was not illegal and since it was negotiated as an integral part of the plea…