Opinion
2014-09245
08-17-2016
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (Anna Kou of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Keith Dolan, and Michael L. Akavan [Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP], of counsel), for respondent.
THOMAS A. DICKERSON COLLEEN D. DUFFY HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ. (Ind. No. 3059/13)
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (Anna Kou of counsel), for appellant.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Keith Dolan, and Michael L. Akavan [Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP], of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), rendered September 16, 2014, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal contempt in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in allowing the People to introduce certain uncharged crime evidence (see People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 241-242; see also People v Resek, 3 NY3d 385, 390; cf. People v Dorm, 12 NY3d 16, 19; People v Pham, 118 AD3d 1159, 1161; People v Ashman, 292 AD2d 458, 458-459). However, contrary to the defendant's contention, under the circumstances of this case, the error did not deprive him of his due process right to a fair trial (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 238; see also People v Smith, 131 AD3d 1270, 1273).
The defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was improperly based on the crime of which he was acquitted is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Malcolm, 131 AD3d 1068, 1071; People v Morgan, 27 AD3d 579, 580) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Morgan, 27 AD3d at 580; People v Robinson, 250 AD2d 629, 629; cf. People v Grant, 94 AD3d 1139, 1141-1142). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
CHAMBERS, J.P., DICKERSON, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur. ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court