From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Winegard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 24, 1992

Appeal from the Ontario County Court, Harvey, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant pled guilty to two counts of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192, [3]; § 1193 [1] [c]), and one count of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511). On appeal, defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations because of the failure of assigned counsel to meet with him and to investigate the facts of his arrest and the underlying conviction.

Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137). The record does not support defendant's conclusory statement that he did not meet with counsel, but establishes that defendant and his various assigned counsel could not agree on a trial strategy. That disagreement does not render counsel's assistance ineffective. Defendant was given ample time to consider the plea offer, and does not allege that he entered the plea because of his attorney's poor performance or that his plea was not knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see, People v Corwin, 137 A.D.2d 872, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 1025).


Summaries of

People v. Winegard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Winegard

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARC WINEGARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)