Defendant's motion to vacate the conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10, based upon the People's alleged failure to disclose evidence impacting adversely on the credibility of a prosecution witness, was properly denied (see, People v. Clausell, 182 A.D.2d 132, 135, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 761; People v. Alongi, 131 A.D.2d 767, 768). The record with respect to that motion fails to support defendant's allegation that the People entered into an agreement with the witness to induce him to testify (see, People v. Wilson, 237 A.D.2d 973, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 866; People v. Orr, 190 A.D.2d 760, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 974; cf., People v. Steadman, 82 N.Y.2d 1). Further, the People satisfied their statutory obligation to disclose the record of judgment of conviction of that witness (see, CPL 240.45 [b]; People v. Wilson, supra). "A youthful offender adjudication is not a judgment of conviction for a crime" (CPL 720.35). Although defendant was entitled, for purposes of impeachment, to cross-examine that witness with respect to the acts underlying his youthful offender adjudication (see, People v. Scott, 134 Misc.2d 224, 226; see also, People v. Greer, 42 N.Y.2d 170, 176; People v. Cook, 37 N.Y.2d 591, 595), information concerning those underlying acts did not constitute Brady material. "Absent a connection to the crime charged, it was collateral and it was not otherwise the kind of material required by the courts to be supplied to defendant for use to impeach a witness (see, United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667; Giglio v.