From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wilson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1157 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

105573

12-04-2014

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Solomon A. WILSON, Appellant.

Joseph Nalli, Fort Plain, for appellant, and appellant pro se. Louise K. Sira, District Attorney, Johnstown (James P. Riley of counsel), for respondent.


Joseph Nalli, Fort Plain, for appellant, and appellant pro se.Louise K. Sira, District Attorney, Johnstown (James P. Riley of counsel), for respondent.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, ROSE, LYNCH and DEVINE, JJ.

Opinion Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Fulton County (Hoye, J.), rendered November 1, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and conspiracy in the fourth degree.

In satisfaction of two pending indictments, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and conspiracy in the fourth degree, and waived his right to appeal. In accordance with the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of five years, followed by two years of postrelease supervision, and 1 ½ to 3 years, respectively. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, defense counsel's brief and defendant's pro se submission, we disagree. Defendant's pro se brief challenges the validity of the waiver of his right to appeal, as well as the validity of the indictment charging him with conspiracy in the fourth degree. Inasmuch as these issues cannot be characterized as “wholly frivolous,” the application of defense counsel to be relieved of his assignment is granted and defendant will be assigned new counsel to address these issues and any other issues that the record may disclose (People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 636, 722 N.Y.S.2d 217, 744 N.E.2d 1153 [2001] ; see People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986] ).

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.


Summaries of

People v. Wilson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1157 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SOLOMON A. WILSON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 4, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 1157 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
998 N.Y.S.2d 484
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8513

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

Defendant appealed and his assigned counsel filed an Anders brief and moved to be relieved as counsel. This…

People v. Wilson

Defendant appealed and his assigned counsel filed an Anders brief and moved to be relieved as counsel. This…