From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1785.2) KA 01-00486

December 21, 2001.

(Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Buscaglia, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.)

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HAYES, SCUDDER, BURNS AND GORSKI, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

By failing to move to withdraw her plea of guilty or to object to the sentence imposed on the ground that it was not the sentence promised pursuant to the terms of the plea bargain, defendant failed to preserve for our review her present contention that the imposition of consecutive rather than concurrent sentences violated Supreme Court's sentencing promise ( see, People v. Headley, 219 A.D.2d 857, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 848). Defendant's alternative contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe is encompassed by defendant's knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal ( see, People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 737).


Summaries of

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LYNDA WILSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 463

Citing Cases

People v. Schmiege

Finally, defendant argues that the court violated the plea bargain by imposing $ 3,700 in restitution instead…

People v. Schmiege

Finally, defendant argues that the court violated the plea bargain by imposing $3,700 in restitution instead…