From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Willis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 2004
5 A.D.3d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2001-08006.

Decided March 1, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered August 22, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and unlawful possession of marijuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (John R. Schick of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Marion M. Tang of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS and BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the limited extent to which a prosecution witness was allowed to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination did not undermine the defendant's right of confrontation ( see People v. Chin, 67 N.Y.2d 22; People v. Navarro, 251 A.D.2d 353; People v. Brock, 238 A.D.2d 347; People v. Rodriguez, 177 A.D.2d 664).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 N.Y.2d 80).

S. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Willis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 2004
5 A.D.3d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Willis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. DANIEL WILLIS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 912