Opinion
December 30, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his application to withdraw his plea of guilty to manslaughter in the first degree (see, CPL 220.60; People v McMahon, 163 A.D.2d 588; People v Brown, 142 A.D.2d 683). The defendant pleaded guilty after a complete and detailed plea allocution, during which he expressed satisfaction with his attorney, and was fully apprised of the consequences of his plea (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). Moreover, the factual admissions made by the defendant during his plea allocution were sufficient to establish the elements of the crime, and, at no point during the plea proceedings did he assert his innocence (see, People v Howard, 138 A.D.2d 525; People v Melendez, 135 A.D.2d 660).
Furthermore, we find that the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Kunzeman, J.P., Sullivan, Eiber and O'Brien, JJ., concur.