Opinion
October 10, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the People improperly introduced evidence concerning his alleged motive for the crime is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05). In any event, in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, any error was harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 241-242). Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.