Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Lake County Super. Ct. No. CR911657.
RIVERA, J.
Joseph Lee Williams appeals from a judgment imposed after revocation of his probation. His counsel raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was apprised of his right to file a supplemental brief but did not do so.
On July 20, 2007, defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing; on July 30, he pled guilty to possession of cocaine. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on probation for three years on conditions including that he obey all laws and that he complete a drug treatment program.
On October 22, 2007, defendant’s probation officer filed a report and affidavit recommending revocation of defendant’s probation on the ground that he violated a restraining order issued against him and, thus, did not obey all laws as required by the terms of his probation. The matter was thereafter continued several times, on some occasions due to defendant’s failure to appear. On May 21, 2008, defendant’s probation officer filed an amended report and affidavit indicating that defendant violated the terms of his probation by failing to submit monthly reports to the probation officer, disobeying a domestic violence restraining order, and committing a battery against a former girlfriend.
On May 30, 2008, defendant admitted that he violated probation by failing to report to his probation officer. The court referred the matter to the probation department for a supplemental report.
On August 8, 2008, defendant moved to withdraw his admission to violating probation. On October 3, 2008, defendant withdrew the motion. The court continued the matter for sentencing. On December 17, 2008, the court sentenced defendant to the midterm of two years in state prison. The court granted defendant custody credits of 403 days.
Defendant was represented by counsel throughout the proceedings. There was no error in the sentencing. This court has reviewed the entire record and there are no meritorious issues to be argued.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: RUVOLO, P.J., SEPULVEDA, J.