From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jan 24, 2020
66 Misc. 3d 139 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

Opinion

2016-2940 K CR

01-24-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tawana WILLIAMS, Appellant.

Appellate Advocates (Nao Terai of counsel), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).


Appellate Advocates (Nao Terai of counsel), for appellant.

Kings County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).

PRESENT: MICHELLE WESTON, J.P., DAVID ELLIOT, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; People v. Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

WESTON, J.P., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jan 24, 2020
66 Misc. 3d 139 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tawana Williams…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Jan 24, 2020

Citations

66 Misc. 3d 139 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 50093
120 N.Y.S.3d 704