From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 3, 2017
501 Mich. 876 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154888 COA: 321355

10-03-2017

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamal Iban WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion to file additional pro per supplement is GRANTED. By order of March 7, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v. Comer (Docket No. 152713). The case having been decided on June 23, 2017, 500 Mich. 278, 901 N.W.2d 553 (2017), the application is again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment addressing the trial court's sua sponte order for resentencing, VACATE the June 11, 2014 judgment of sentence, and REMAND this case to the Macomb Circuit Court to reinstate the April 2, 2014 judgment of sentence. In Comer , we held that correcting an invalid sentence by adding a statutorily mandated term is a substantive correction that a trial court may make on its own initiative only before judgment is entered. In this case, the trial court did not have authority to sua sponte order resentencing to impose a mandatory minimum habitual offender sentence under MCL 769.12. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 3, 2017
501 Mich. 876 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamal Iban…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Oct 3, 2017

Citations

501 Mich. 876 (Mich. 2017)
901 N.W.2d 600

Citing Cases

Williams v. Warren

On direct appeal, the Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court to reinstate the original…

People v. Ezell

The Court, however, did not discuss the particular facts or analyze the distinction between a clerical…