From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 2002
297 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1999-11043

Submitted September 12, 2002.

October 1, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barbaro, J.), rendered November 17, 1999, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Karol B. Mangum of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant's contention that he was deprived of his right to fully cross-examine a prosecution witness. The defendant failed to show that "relevant and important facts bearing on the trustworthiness of crucial testimony" were kept from the jury (cf. People v. Ashner, 190 A.D.2d 238, 247). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to give the defendant the opportunity to recall the witness for further cross-examination.

ALTMAN, J.P., FLORIO, O'BRIEN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 2002
297 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. AUSTIN WILLIAMS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 2002

Citations

297 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 64

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Nathaniel

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court properly denied his request to recall the…