Opinion
Gen. No. 41,595. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed April 14, 1941. Rehearing denied April 28, 1941.
PROSTITMON AND PANDERING, § 3 — sufficiency of evidence. In prosecution for pandering evidence showed that defendant accepted money from complaining witness with knowledge that it was from her earnings as a prostitute, arrest without warrant was proper because the criminal offense had actually been committed, evidence that defendant and complaining witness had lived together in an illicit relationship was properly admitted to show the relationship of the parties, use of leading questions did not constitute reversible error, and defendant was represented by experienced and competent counsel.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, name topic and section number.
Error to Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. NUNCIO J. BONELLI, presiding.
Affirmed. Heard in first division, first district, this court at February term, 1941.
Ellis Westbrooks and Joseph J. Attwell, Jr., for plaintiff in error;
Richard E. Westbrooks, of counsel;
Thomas J. Courtney, State's Attorney, for defendant in error;
Edward E. Wilson, John T. Gallagher and Melvin S. Rembe, Assistant State's Attorneys of counsel.
"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed April 14, 1941; rehearing denied April 28, 1941.