Opinion
June 4, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the third and fourth counts of the indictment are dismissed, without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges to another Grand Jury (see, People v. Beslanovics, 57 N.Y.2d 726), and a new trial is ordered with respect to the remaining counts.
Reversal of the defendant's judgment of conviction is mandated by our prior holding, made on the appeal of the codefendant Vincent Dunlap, with whom the defendant was jointly tried, that the prosecutor's summation was so highly inflammatory and prejudicial as to deprive the defendants of a fair trial (see, People v. Dunlap, 138 A.D.2d 393).
Because a new trial is required, we do not reach the defendant's remaining contention. Mangano, P.J., Lawrence, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.