Opinion
May 13, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.).
Ordered, that the judgment is affirmed.
The record indicates that the police interaction with the defendant was justified in its inception and reasonably limited in scope at each step in response to the circumstances presented ( see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759; People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210 ; People v. Marino, 212 A.D.2d 735; see also, People v Martines, 80 N.Y.2d 444; People v. Boodle, 47 N.Y.2d 398). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. Ritter, J.P., Thompson, Hart and McGinity, JJ., concur.