From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1991
171 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

March 4, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by vacating the provision thereof which directed the defendant to make restitution in the sum of $1,480; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.

It is well settled that the word "victim" in Penal Law § 60.27 does not include the governmental agency which expends public monies in its efforts to solve crimes (see, People v Cerna, 163 A.D.2d 409; People v Purcell, 161 A.D.2d 812; People v Rowe, 152 A.D.2d 907, affd 75 N.Y.2d 948). Since the $1,480 in restitution ordered by the court was the buy money expended by law enforcement authorities in two drug transactions which led to the defendant's apprehension, restitution was unauthorized, with the result that the restitution provision of the court's sentence should be vacated. Bracken, J.P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1991
171 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
567 N.Y.S.2d 173

Citing Cases

People v. McNatt

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision which directed the…

People v. Clarke

However, even if the facts were stated, suppression would not have been granted, and it cannot be said that…