From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 2010
70 A.D.3d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2008-00554.

February 23, 2010.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered December 20, 2007, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, N.Y., for appellant.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff, Richard Longworth Hecht, and Anthony J. Servino of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Before: Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the plea allocution was factually insufficient to establish the crime of assault in the first degree is not preserved for appellate review as the defendant failed to move either to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing or to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10 ( see CPL 470.05; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725; People v Elcine, 43 AD3d 1176; People v Swanton, 27 AD3d 591; People v Huchital, 22 AD3d 681). The narrow exception to the preservation rule, which arises when the defendant's plea recitation of the facts underlying the crime casts significant doubt on the defendant's guilt ( see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662), is inapplicable in this case.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 2010
70 A.D.3d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

70 A.D.3d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 1679
894 N.Y.S.2d 763

Citing Cases

People v. Scivolette

In any event, the defendant's contention is unsupported by the record ( see People v Bravo, 72 AD3d 697, 698;…

People v. Poznanski

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was not valid ( see People…