Opinion
September 17, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that certain remarks made by the prosecutor deprived him of a fair trial is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v. Santiago, 52 N.Y.2d 865, 866; People v. Parilla, 158 A.D.2d 556; People v. Jalah, 107 A.D.2d 762). In any event, the contention is academic since the defendant was acquitted of the seven other counts of the indictment in relation to which the challenged comments were made (see, CPL 470.15). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Lawrence and O'Brien, JJ., concur.