From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 2003
307 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

KA 02-01080

July 3, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of Monroe County Court (Marks, J.), entered April 5, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree.

EDWARD J. NOWAK, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

HOWARD R. RELIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (KELLY CHRISTINE WOLFORD OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., HURLBUTT, BURNS, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law 160.10). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his request for youthful offender status ( see People v. Smith, 286 A.D.2d 878, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 641). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 2003
307 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TAROY WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 3, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 548

Citing Cases

People v. Dorman

In any event, those contentions lack merit. Defendant received the agreed-upon sentence, and County Court did…