Opinion
May 2, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Sandoval ruling of the Supreme Court (Goldstein, J.), was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see, People v. Jay, 187 A.D.2d 454; People v. Pennetti, 182 A.D.2d 647; People v Moore, 178 A.D.2d 561). Sullivan, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.