Opinion
253 Ind. No. 3454/12 Case No. 2017–02469
05-16-2023
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Taurean WILLIAMS, Defendant–Appellant.
Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Svetlana M. Kornfeind of counsel), for appellant. Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Christian Rose of counsel), for respondent.
Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Svetlana M. Kornfeind of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Christian Rose of counsel), for respondent.
Kern, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Moulton, Rodriguez, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), entered on or about June 14, 2017, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence supported the court's finding that defendant did not genuinely accept responsibility for his sexual misconduct, resulting in an assessment of 10 points under the applicable risk factor (see generally People v. Solomon, 202 A.D.3d 88, 160 N.Y.S.3d 30 [1st Dept. 2021], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 906, 2022 WL 1261737 [2022] ). Although defendant pleaded guilty, he declined to address his responsibility for the offense during his presentence probation interview, failed to appear for sentencing, and was returned on a warrant. While incarcerated, he participated in sex offender treatment but expressed an inappropriate attitude toward such treatment in a letter to the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders.
The record also supports the court's alternative determination that if the 10 points at issue were deducted, thereby reducing defendant's point score to 105 (just below the threshold for level three), an upward departure to level three would be warranted (see generally People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861–862, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). Clear and convincing evidence established aggravating circumstances that were not accounted for by the risk assessment instrument. The circumstances of the instant rape were unusually egregious. In addition, defendant had a recent prior felony conviction where he had been permitted to plead guilty to a nonsexual offense but where the underlying conduct had included sexual violence with similarities to the instant offense. Accordingly, defendant demonstrated a potential danger to the public that was not adequately accounted for by way of point assessments.