From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wigfall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 30, 1994

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The circumstantial evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v. Kennedy, 47 N.Y.2d 196, 203), is sufficient to support defendant's conviction of attempted arson in the first degree (Penal Law § 110.00, 150.20 Penal). We further conclude that the sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. Finally, defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for review (see, CPL 470.05), and we decline to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [a]).


Summaries of

People v. Wigfall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Wigfall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH E. WIGFALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 672